Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
Member Quotes
The post-peak oil, post-housing bust economy is already driving most crazy, and we won't even get to the food riot stage for maybe two more years.

DantesPeak

Suggest Quote

 
aspo08
 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Scientists Cite Breakthrough In Producing Pure Hydrogen
Hydrocarbon AlternativesCarrie writes: Researchers at a government nuclear laboratory and a ceramics company in Salt Lake City say they have found a way to produce pure hydrogen with far less energy than other methods, raising the possibility of using nuclear power to indirectly wean the transportation system from its dependence on oil.


The development would move the country closer to the Energy Department's stated goal of a "hydrogen economy," in which hydrogen would be created through a variety of means and would be consumed by devices called fuel cells to make electricity to run cars and for other purposes.
Experts cite three big obstacles to a hydrogen economy: manufacturing hydrogen cleanly and at low cost, finding a way to ship it and store it, and reducing the high price of fuel cells.
"This is a breakthrough in the first part," said J. Stephen Herring, a consulting engineer at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, which plans to announce the development Monday with Cerametec Inc. of Salt Lake City.
The developers also said the hydrogen could be used by oil companies to stretch oil supplies even without solving the fuel cell and transportation problems.
Herring said the work showed the "highest-known production rate of hydrogen by high-temperature electrolysis."
But the plan requires the building of a new kind of nuclear reactor, at a time when the United States is not even building conventional reactors. And the cost estimates are uncertain.
The heart of the plan is an improvement on the most efficient way to extract hydrogen, which is to run electric current through water, splitting molecules into hydrogen and oxygen, called electrolysis.
The new method involves running electricity through water that has a high temperature. As the water molecule breaks up, a ceramic sieve separates the oxygen from the hydrogen.
The goal is to create a reactor that could produce about 300 megawatts of electricity for the grid, enough to run about 300,000 window air conditioners or produce about 2.5 kilos of hydrogen per second. When burned, a kilo of hydrogen has about the same energy as a gallon of regular gasoline. But fuel cells, which work without burning, get about twice as much work out of each unit of fuel. So if used in automotive fuel cells, the reactor might replace more than 400,000 gallons of gasoline per day.
Another problem is that the United States has no infrastructure for shipping large volumes of hydrogen. Currently, most hydrogen is produced at the point it is used, mostly in oil refineries.

IndyStar.com
Posted on Sunday, November 28 @ 15:20:08 PST by aaron
 
Related Links
· More about Hydrocarbon Alternatives
· News by aaron


Most read story about Hydrocarbon Alternatives:
You can close the site now, energy problems are solved.

 
Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad

 
Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

 Send to a Friend Send to a Friend

 
"Login" | Login/Create an Account | 4 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Scientists Cite Breakthrough In Producing Pure Hydrogen (Score: 1)
by Phil on Sunday, November 28 @ 15:58:46 PST
(User Info | Send a Message)
So just off the top of my head, the US consumes about 400 million gallons of gasoline a day. It would take 1,000 of these reactors to replace that.



Re: Scientists Cite Breakthrough In Producing Pure Hydrogen (Score: 1)
by Phil on Sunday, November 28 @ 16:04:21 PST
(User Info | Send a Message)
So a city like Houston would need about 10, and if they cost $12 billion apiece (wild guess), thats over $100 billion, or about $25,000 per person- in other words a couple of years full income for that city.



Re: Scientists Cite Breakthrough In Producing Pure Hydrogen (Score: 1)
by The_Virginian (cunlingus@clitoris.com) on Monday, November 29 @ 01:22:46 PST
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.pistolanddagger.com
While details are lacking, it seems using heat to speed up a chemical/physical reaction is hardly a "Breakthrough."

I dont get it, so we build a bunch of Nuclear fired reactors, so far so good. We use these to "Cheaply" heat up huge amounts of fresh potable water to create hydrogen.

These reactrors create electricity OR hydrogen, if they could make it a double whammy, it might be viable. Then again how much uranium do we have, and can breeder reactors really give us perpetual "U" ?

Right now it sounds like poorly laid out propaganda from "scientists" who should know better.

I'm not a specialized "energy expert", and the holes in this story are so big I can put my foot through it...



Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed