Peak Oil is You

Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)

Page added on March 27, 2017

Bookmark and Share

A Dream of Clean Energy at a Very High Price

A Dream of Clean Energy at a Very High Price thumbnail


The doughnut-shaped fusion reactor, or tokamak, and other components are kept cool inside one of the world’s largest vacuum chambers.









Absorbs high-energy neutrons produced during the fusion reaction.

SAINT-PAUL-LEZ-DURANCE, France — At a dusty construction site here amid the limestone ridges of Provence, workers scurry around immense slabs of concrete arranged in a ring like a modern-day Stonehenge.

It looks like the beginnings of a large commercial power plant, but it is not. The project, called ITER, is an enormous, and enormously complex and costly, physics experiment. But if it succeeds, it could determine the power plants of the future and make an invaluable contribution to reducing planet-warming emissions.

ITER, short for International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (and pronounced EAT-er), is being built to test a long-held dream: that nuclear fusion, the atomic reaction that takes place in the sun and in hydrogen bombs, can be controlled to generate power.

First discussed in 1985 at a United States-Soviet Union summit, the multinational effort, in which the European Union has a 45 percent stake and the United States, Russia, China and three other partners 9 percent each, has long been cited as a crucial step toward a future of near-limitless electric power.

ITER will produce heat, not electricity. But if it works — if it produces more energy than it consumes, which smaller fusion experiments so far have not been able to do — it could lead to plants that generate electricity without the climate-affecting carbon emissions of fossil-fuel plants or most of the hazards of existing nuclear reactors that split atoms rather than join them.

Mimicking the Sun


1 Central magnet induces a current in the plasma, which contains two hydrogen isotopes. Heating begins.

2 External magnets confine plasma as radio waves and microwaves heat it to 150 million degrees Celsius.

High-energy neutron




3 When plasma is at proper temperature and density, isotopes collide and fuse, releasing high-energy neutrons.

4 Neutrons hit blanket, converting energy into heat. Helium and impurities are removed through diverter at bottom of chamber.


5 In a fusion power

plant, the heat would

be used to make

steam to spin a

turbine and





Steam turbine

Heat transfer

Fusion power plant

Success, however, has always seemed just a few decades away for ITER. The project has progressed in fits and starts for years, plagued by design and management problems that have led to long delays and ballooning costs.

ITER is moving ahead now, with a director-general, Bernard Bigot, who took over two years ago after an independent analysis that was highly critical of the project. Dr. Bigot, who previously ran France’s atomic energy agency, has earned high marks for resolving management problems and developing a realistic schedule based more on physics and engineering and less on politics.

“I do believe we are moving at full speed and maybe accelerating,” Dr. Bigot said in an interview.

The site here is now studded with tower cranes as crews work on the concrete structures that will support and surround the heart of the experiment, a doughnut-shaped chamber called a tokamak. This is where the fusion reactions will take place, within a plasma, a roiling cloud of ionized atoms so hot that it can be contained only by extremely strong magnetic fields.

Pieces of the tokamak and other components, including giant superconducting electromagnets and a structure that at approximately 100 feet in diameter and 100 feet tall will be the largest stainless-steel vacuum vessel ever made, are being fabricated in the participating countries. Assembly is set to begin next year in a giant hall erected next to the tokamak site.


At the ITER construction site, immense slabs of concrete lie in a ring like a modern-day Stonehenge. Credit ITER Organization

There are major technical hurdles in a project where the manufacturing and construction are on the scale of shipbuilding but the parts need to fit with the precision of a fine watch.

“It’s a challenge,” said Dr. Bigot, who devotes much of his time to issues related to integrating parts from various countries. “We need to be very sensitive about quality.”

Even if the project proceeds smoothly, the goal of “first plasma,” using pure hydrogen that does not undergo fusion, would not be reached for another eight years. A so-called burning plasma, which contains a fraction of an ounce of fusible fuel in the form of two hydrogen isotopes, deuterium and tritium, and can be sustained for perhaps six or seven minutes and release large amounts of energy, would not be achieved until 2035 at the earliest.

That is a half century after the subject of cooperating on a fusion project came up at a meeting in Geneva between President Ronald Reagan and the Soviet leader Mikhail S. Gorbachev. A functional commercial fusion power plant would be even further down the road.

“Fusion is very hard,” said Riccardo Betti, a researcher at the University of Rochester who has followed the ITER project for years. “Plasma is not your friend. It tries to do everything it can to really displease you.”

Main Tokamak Components








Fusion is also very expensive. ITER estimates the cost of design and construction at about 20 billion euros (currently about $22 billion). But the actual cost of components may be higher in some of the participating countries, like the United States, because of high labor costs. The eventual total United States contribution, which includes an enormous central electromagnet capable, it is said, of lifting an aircraft carrier, has been estimated at about $4 billion.

Despite the recent progress there are still plenty of doubts about ITER, especially in the United States, which left the project for five years at the turn of the century and where funding through the Energy Department has long been a political football.

The department confirmed its support for ITER in a report last year and Congress approved $115 million for it. It is unclear, though, how the project will fare in the Trump administration, which has proposed a cut of roughly 20 percent to the department’s Office of Science, which funds basic research including ITER. (The department also funds another long-troubled fusion project, which uses lasers, at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California.)

Dr. Bigot met with the new energy secretary, Rick Perry, last week in Washington, and said he found Mr. Perry “very open to listening” about ITER and its long-term goals. “But he has to make some short-term choices” with his budget, Dr. Bigot said.

Energy Department press aides did not respond to requests for comment.

Some in Congress, including Senator Lamar Alexander, Republican of Tennessee, while lauding Dr. Bigot’s efforts, argue that the project already consumes too much of the Energy Department’s basic research budget of about $5 billion.


Pillars at the ITER Cryoplant in Provencal; Bernard Bigot, the ITER director-general, previously ran France’s atomic energy agency. Credit ITER Organization

“I remain concerned that continuing to support the ITER project would come at the expense of other Office of Science priorities that the Department of Energy has said are more important — and that I consider more important,” Mr. Alexander said in a statement.

While it is not clear what would happen to the project if the United States withdrew, Dr. Bigot argues that it is in every participating country’s interest to see it through. “You have a chance to know if fusion works or not,” he said. “If you miss this chance, maybe it will never come again.”

But even scientists who support ITER are concerned about the impact it has on other research.

“People around the country who work on projects that are the scientific basis for fusion are worried that they’re in a no-win situation,” said William Dorland, a physicist at the University of Maryland who is chairman of the plasma science committee of the National Academy of Sciences. “If ITER goes forward, it might eat up all the money. If it doesn’t expand and the U.S. pulls out, it may pull down a lot of good science in the downdraft.”

In the ITER tokamak, deuterium and tritium nuclei will fuse to form helium, losing a small amount of mass that is converted into a huge amount of energy. Most of the energy will be carried away by neutrons, which will escape the plasma and strike the walls of the tokamak, producing heat.

In a fusion power plant, that heat would be used to make steam to turn a turbine to generate electricity, much as existing power plants do using other sources of heat, like burning coal. ITER’s heat will be dissipated through cooling towers.


Pillars at the ITER Cryoplant in Provencal. Credit ITER Organization

There is no risk of a runaway reaction and meltdown as with nuclear fission and, while radioactive waste is produced, it is not nearly as long-lived as the spent fuel rods and irradiated components of a fission reactor.

To fuse, atomic nuclei must move very fast — they must be extremely hot — to overcome natural repulsive forces and collide. In the sun, the extreme gravitational field does much of the work. Nuclei need to be at a temperature of about 15 million degrees Celsius.

In a tokamak, without such a strong gravitational pull, the atoms need to be about 10 times hotter. So enormous amounts of energy are required to heat the plasma, using pulsating magnetic fields and other sources like microwaves. Just a few feet away, on the other hand, the windings of the superconducting electromagnets need to be cooled to a few degrees above absolute zero. Needless to say, the material and technical challenges are extreme.

Although all fusion reactors to date have produced less energy than they use, physicists are expecting that ITER will benefit from its larger size, and will produce about 10 times more power than it consumes. But they will face many challenges, chief among them developing the ability to prevent instabilities in the edges of the plasma that can damage the experiment.

Even in its early stages of construction, the project seems overwhelmingly complex. Embedded in the concrete surfaces are thousands of steel plates. They seem to be scattered at random throughout the structure, but actually are precisely located. ITER is being built to French nuclear plant standards, which prohibit drilling into concrete. So the plates — eventually about 80,000 of them — are where other components of the structure will be attached as construction progresses.

A mistake or two now could wreak havoc a few years down the road, but Dr. Bigot said that in this and other work on ITER, the key to avoiding errors was taking time.

“People consider that it’s long,” he said, referring to critics of the project timetable. “But if you want full control of quality, you need time.”

NY Times

12 Comments on "A Dream of Clean Energy at a Very High Price"

  1. sinnycool on Mon, 27th Mar 2017 9:21 pm 

    “ITER estimates the cost of design and construction at about 20 billion euros (currently about $22 billion).”

    It’s uncertain what comparative ROI they might have achieved by putting $22 billion into, say, flow batteries to support 10KW dwelling-suitable solar systems rather than ITER.

    Its certain we will never know.

  2. Go Speed Racer on Mon, 27th Mar 2017 10:17 pm 

    What a scam.
    Somebody explained on Peak Oil already,
    the power production density is too low.
    You would need to make the reactor hugely
    gigantic, to have viable power production.
    Not economical, per the laws of physics.

    People say the fusion plant is ‘just like the sun’. It’s not. The reaction process in the sun is entirely different. AND the power density on that one is even lower… VERY low wattage per cubic yard of sun core.

    But, there’s no reason why we should use any scientific principles. A lot of people believe that fusion power will take over when the oil runs out. We don’t want to interfere with their blind religious faith, let them sing and pray. No need to debate this with them, and get into a religious fusion argument.

  3. davy-fan on Mon, 27th Mar 2017 10:51 pm 

    they’re on the verge of breakthru next month but they need another 20 billion to install a supplemental heat sink module due to the extra power the machine puts out

  4. GregT on Mon, 27th Mar 2017 11:00 pm 

    We already have one Sun, and the Earth certainly does not need another.

    Stupid humans. Don’t know when to stop.

    The first law of holes:

    “If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging”

  5. bug on Tue, 28th Mar 2017 1:22 am 

    Anytime I read an article about this device, I feel that Raymond Scott’s tune “Powerhouse” should be playing.

  6. Anonymouse on Tue, 28th Mar 2017 3:35 am 

    A pipe-dream of ‘clean’, sorry, dirty energy, more like….

  7. Cloggie on Tue, 28th Mar 2017 3:55 am 

    This fusion technology should be put on hold, perhaps have a try again in the 22nd century. We meanwhile have all the technology we need to set up an alt-energy base.

    In fact it is being implemented around the world as we speak.

    Globally there is now 305GW of solar power capacity, up from around 50GW in 2010 and virtually nothing at the turn of the millennium… Nearly half of the solar installed last year was in China, with Asia as a whole making up two-thirds of new capacity in 2016.

    Fusion is the desperate attempt of governments to have a extremely centralized form of energy available, only they can control, where a wind turbine can be installed by a group of individuals:

  8. Jerome Purtzer on Tue, 28th Mar 2017 1:26 pm 

    I think you are right Cloggie. The best fusion reactor has already been invented. All we have to do is figure out how to download the power. Tesla had many ways to use radiant energy-too bad he isn’t alive today. He’d have a million inventions with all of the new substances and tools(electronics) available.

  9. Bob on Tue, 28th Mar 2017 1:48 pm 

    Capturing solar fusion energy is simple. In 2000 I installed a batch solar water heater. No moving parts. It worked at zero expense until 2014, when I refurbished it with a new tank and piping. It is still working today and I expect it to be working forever, as long as it is rebuilt periodically. Think of all the solar water heaters this fusion thing could have bought; the entire USA could now be running on solar hot water. What are we thinking?

  10. GB on Tue, 28th Mar 2017 2:14 pm 

    Wind power, solar power, fusion power whatever, we need a new paradigm for this world. The model that allocates capital and wealth based on consumption and excess is dying and there will be instability until a new model rises. Fusion power is the best shot of a dying system. If they can pull it off, then it’ll be the best shot of the new system. Centralized = efficient. Distributed = redundant.

  11. Cloggie on Tue, 28th Mar 2017 2:31 pm 

    Centralized = efficient. Distributed = redundant.

    Why are the solar panels on my roof “redundant”?

  12. Davy on Tue, 28th Mar 2017 2:43 pm 

    Distributed = resilient
    Centralized = efficient = increased systematic risk

    Like much of life’s situations there are trade offs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *